Legal Analysis of the Customary Practices in the Resolution of Family Disputes in Pakistan
Legal Analysis of the Customary Practices in the Resolution of Family Disputes in Pakistan
Zeeshan Ashraf
Mohammad Azam Hussain
Ain Husna Mohd Arshad
 
Abstract: Customary Practices (CP) for the resolution of family disputes including Jirga and Panchayat are prevalent in Pakistan. Pakistan is a Muslim-majority State and a signatory to a number of international human rights conventions, e.g., ICCPR, ICESCR, and CEDAW. Using qualitative research methods, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants to determine the true nature of the CP in question. The examination of these CP based on the provisions of international human rights conventions reveals that some of the CP violate Islamic teachings as well as certain provisions of the international human rights conventions. The continuous use of such CP means that Pakistan has failed to implement its international human rights obligations in two aspects: first, failing to prevent CP that violates these obligations; and second, failing to provide inexpensive justice in family disputes. The article argues for the institutionalization of family dispute resolution (FDR) in Pakistan to adapt the provisions of international human rights conventions and to eliminate human rights violations in Pakistan.

 


Please Sign in if already registered Subscriber.

Or

Please Register and make the necessary subscription payment to activate your account.

Adobe Reader